This theme is downloaded from wordpress themes website.

Future microchips based on collective intelligence

The Technology Review posted the other day an article on the “10 Emerging Technologies of 2008“. Very promising technologies indeed, but the one that really caught my attention was the Probabilistic Chips currently studied by Krishna Palem.

The reason I find this particular research so interesting is, that

  • it has the potential of extending current scaling laws - and particularly Moore’s Law
  • it takes advantage of the principles of collective intelligence and the wisdom of crowds.

The theory of Probabilistic Chips

According to the article

Palem has developed a way for chips to use significantly less power in exchange for a small loss of precision. [...] chips could be designed to produce the correct answer sometimes, but only come close the rest of the time. Because the errors would be small, so would their effects: in essence, Palem believes that in computing, close enough is often good enough.

Current Scaling Laws

From the beginning of the twentieth century until today, a series of laws has emerged concerning the growth of computers and networks. They all negotiate the value of a network according to the technological leverage of the time.

Processor_inside

  • Sarnoff’s law, which was interested in the growth of radio and television networks (the value of the network is proportional to the number of actors)
  • Metcalfe’s Law describing the value and the growth of small scale networks (the “value” or “power” of a network increases in proportion to the square of the number of nodes on the network).
  • Reed’s Law describing the value of Group Forming Networks (the value of networks, that support the construction of communicating groups create value that scales exponentially with network size).
  • Moore’s law handling the evolution and expansion of computer microchips (the number of transistors on a chip will double about every two years).

One can notice the evolution from Sarnoff’s Law to Reed’s Law.

While Sarnoff’s Law was suggesting, that the value of a broadcast station (television or radio) would increase proportionally to its audience it could not be applied to more complex networks, since the degree of interconnectivity was much higher.

So Metcalfe’s Law was an evolutionary step of Sarnoff’s Law, which better described the upcoming computer networks (ARPANET) in the 1960s. But Metcalfe’s Law could be easily be applied to small computer or telephone networks, but certainly not to huge networks like the Internet.

Reed’s Law emerged to describe the masive development of the web and more specifically of the social web.

Moore’s Law, on the other hand remains stable. Although it finds application on the expansion of computer microchip technology for more than 40 years, its validity is lately at stake. The reason is, that silicon transistors are becoming smaller and smaller and therefore less reliable.

But that’s where the probabilistic chips come in play, to keep the microprocessor technology rapidly evolving.

With probabilistic chips, tiny microprocessors may be designed in such way, that the individual parts might be imperfect, but collectively bring perfect results.

Collective Intelligence

The probabilistic chip technology actually takes advantage of the theory of collective intelligence.

As supported by the Condorcet Jury Theorem [pdf], the probability of a correct answer by a majority of the group increases toward 100% as the size of the group increases. The validity of the Theorem is based on the hypothesis, that the answers provided by each individual are not random - but instead there is a more than 50% probability to be correct.

The Condorcet Jury Theorem might be criticized when we are dealing with humans, but machines can be programmed to work in such a manner.

It seems to me, that this is how cultural revolutions emerge: combining disciplines, which at first seem irrelevant to bring forth innovative ideas and technologies.

Probabilistic chips, can change the scenery of energy consumption, mobile technologies and microprocessor development; and all that by applying an almost 200 old theory to a completely different research field.

Technology robojiannis 17 Mar 2008 3 Comments

20+ sources to read about the web

books_ontop

This is the second, more detailed part of the readings, studies, lessons, articles and essays I have found online about the theory and analysis of the web. The first part was relatively small, I admit, but I hope this list will keep you reading for some time.

Copyright and the Commons

Free Culture [Lawrence Lessig] : A discussion on the current laws of copyright and their implication to innovation and exchange of ideas.

Free for All [Peter Wayner] : An introduction the cyberculture of linux and its results in free software development.

The Right to Read [Richard M. Stallman] : A political, ideological essay on SPA (Software Publisher’s Association).

Hacker Crackdown [Bruce Sterling] : The history of hacker subculture during the 1990s. Cory Doctorow made an audiobook of it, which I edited for better listening. You can download it here [torrent].

The wealth of Networks: How social production transforms market and Freedom [Yochai Benkler] : A look at the economical aspects of networks, property and the commons.

Communications Infrastructure Regulation and the Distribution of Control Over Content [Yochai Benkler] : With the argument, that current infrastructures of communication and distribution have a negative impact on individual autonomy and public, Benkler suggests a new model.

For more texts of Yochai Benkler, visit his homepage benkler.org.

Open University Seminars

Network security lesson : A Master’s level lesson on networks. How they function and therefore how can they be protected.

Information on the Web : An introductory lesson, teaching tactics to find what you are looking for online. As I said, introductory.

Sociological studies of virtual worlds

My tiny Life: Crime and Passion in a Virtual World [Julian Dibbell] : A sort of ethnographic study on the social life of the LambdaMoo virtual world, which thrived in the early 1990s. If you have read Sherry Turkle’s “Life on the Screen“, you get the picture.

The Online World [Odd de Presno] : The structure of the online world and how to take advantage of your time and effort in it. Pretty basic.

motherboard_network

Network Theory & Social Networks

Scale Free Networks [Albert Laszlo Barabasi] : A very good essay to understand the basics of scale free networks and how the internet is interconnected.

Taming Complexity [Albert Laszlo Barabasi] : Like “Scale Free Networks”, an introductory approach to the subject.

The physics of the Web [Albert Laszlo Barabasi] : The structure and dynamics of the Internet.

These three essays of Barabasi can give a very good overview of the way the web is connected, the role of hubs, the importance of linkage, etc. I really like his work and I definetely suggest his book “Linked” on the same thematology [not free to download].

That sneaky exponential [David Reed] : Why participation in social networks counts. The next step after Metcalfe’s Law is Reed’s Law. Very insightful and very good argumented.

The augmented social Network: building identity and trust into the next-generation internet [Ken Jordan, Jan Hauser, Steven Forster] : The six degrees of seperation seem just too many. “This paper proposes the creation of an Augmented Social Network (ASN) that would build identity and trust into the architecture of the Internet, in the public interest, in order to facilitate introductions between people who share affinities or complementary capabilities across social networks.”

Virtual Interactive Communication: A bicultural Surve [Dave Ambrose] : A theoretical study on Web 2.0 and social networks such as Facebook.

Attention economy of the Web

Propaganda [Edward Bernays] : To understand how attentiveness of the collective mind works, the strategies of propaganda are certainly the foundations.

The economy of attention [Georg Franck] : A very good essay on the attention economy, from an expert of the subject.

Attention and Participation in the social Web [Jiannis Sotiropoulos] : Narcissistically enough, this is my master thesis on the attention economy of the social web. Network theory, sociology, mass psychology and emergent behavior are used in this study. I always welcome your feedback. The thesis is also in wiki format.

 

software_0101010

Software vs. Hardware

There is no software [Friedrich Kittler] : A complex, but very interesting point of view, why there are no software but only hardware.

On the implementation of Knowledge - towards a theory of hardware
[Friedrich Kittler] : Once again why the relationship between hardware and software remain a paradox.
More works of Friedrich Kittler. His writings are very theoretical and provocative, but always interesting to read. Some texts are in German.

Authorship robojiannis 14 Mar 2008 3 Comments

Why the same topics reach the frontpage of social networks; analyzing Digg

Have you ever wondered why the topics reaching the frontpage of some social networks are very often about the same subject?

When you read the frontpage of reddit, you will notice mostly political and world news articles. Propeller too concentrates on political topics. Digg in its turn, is full of technology news. This is something, every blogger knows and the analysis at SocialMediaTrader proves. But why is that?

I mean there is nothing in the Terms of Use at these social networks, saying that only submissions of a specific genre are required. Everybody is free to submit anything and the wisdom of the crowd, will bring a post up or bury it. But still in a magical way, the posts reaching the front page are not diverse.

In this post I will analyze and visualize the network of the digg users, to show why technology is the favorite topic in Digg.

How relationships define the popularity of a topic

There are 3 requirements for a submission to reach the frontpage of any social network:

  1. The quality of content.
  2. Who submits the posts.
  3. Who are the friends of the submitter.

These are points we are all aware of. When a top user submits a post, he gives it - in a sense - an additional popularity boost. His authoritative figure in the social network, says to the other users, that this particular post is worth their time.

But a point we are sometimes missing out, is that the friends of a top user does not only define the popularity of a post, but sometimes also the popularity of a genre.

Lets take a look at the top users of Digg.

The Digg Example

I decided to study Digg, since it is one of the least diverse social networks. In order to find the reason of this, I took a deep look at the network of the top digg users (according to Chris Finke’s data on digg).

  • Step 1. I concentrated on the top 10 Digg users and saw if they were friends with each other.
  • Step 2. I selected a random user from the list with a high popular ratio. The user I chose was sepultura, 28th top user with a submission/popularity ratio of 61.1%.
  • Step 3. I visualized the data into a network, to see how highly these users were connected.
  • Step 4. I collected the most dugg topics of each user the past 30 days.

Digg’s top 10 Users

Click to enlarge

I wanted to see if the top users are mutual friends and therefore view and promote each others submissions.

I also chose a random user with a high ratio, in order to see if he also was befriended with those top users. If so the popularity of his submissions could also rely on his friends.

If the top digg users were all befriended and interested in the same topics, it would actually be the reason for this monotony in subjects.

Visualizing Digg’s top users

The result of the visualization shows that the top 10 digg users are actually mutual friends and are in fact creating a very condence network.

Digg’s top 10 users_visual

Click to enlarge

  • Mklopez (rank:10) is mutually befriended with all the others apart from p9s50W5k4GUD2c6 (!!) (rank 7).
  • supernova17 (rank:4) is mutually befriended with 7 others, while msaleem (rank:2), mrbabyman (rank:1) and digitalgopher (rank:5) with 6.
  • In fact, when these top users are befriended it is always mutual friendship, with the only exception of CLIFFosakaJAPAN (rank:6), who is a fan of Zaibatsu (rank:3).
  • Only aaaz - the 8th top user - is mutually befriended with only 2 other top diggers.
  • Sepultura, (rank:28) the random digger with high popularity ratio, was mutually befriended with 5 others: mrbabyman, msaleem, supernova17, zaibatsu and mklopez.

So it seems, that Digg’s top 10 users are mutually befriended and therefore are aware of each others submissions. Sepultura, might not be that popular but his popularity ratio is extremely high (61.1%). Is it a coincidence, that he is mutually befriended with the most connected top diggers?
The next step was to see, what are actually the interests of these users. Not surprisingly, apart from P9 and aaaz, all the other users (including sepultura) have as one of their main interests Technology News.

P9 and aaaz seem to have mostly political interests (second most popular topic of digg) and are actually the least connected of the group. P9 is mutually befriended with 4 top diggers (aaz among them), while aaaz is befriended with only p9 and mklopez (the most connected).

The Conclusion

The information collected show how the top diggers are actually in position of controlling the whole thematology of Digg. They have the same interests and are therefore friends with each other. It is only natural that they also like the same content. There is nothing wrong with that.

The power of the top diggers doesn’t rely on the fact, that they are popular but mostly on the fact that they have formed their own network.

But since their influence is so obvious and Digg isn’t specifically a technology network, I am not surprised that Digg enabled couple of months ago a more strict algorithm for a submission to reach the front page.

 

StumbleUpon topic Distribution

Image from SocialMediaTrader

I tried to do the same research with StumbleUpon, to see if the top stumblers are also that befriended as in Digg. It is certainly not the case. I suppose that’s why StumbleUpon has a much more diverse range of topics.

social networks robojiannis 10 Mar 2008 8 Comments

Web 1.0 sites that still rule

We are witnessing the commercialization, standardization of the web. Gradients, odd names, mirror effects and so on can be found everywhere online.

Although web 2.0 certainly brought an online revolution, the old times of cyberspace had also a flair of their own.

This is a list of “web 1.0″ sites. They are great sources of net art; some of them are full of theoretical essays, others are activist projects and there are even some who are extremely experimental.

You are warned, most of these sites are by no chance any eye-candy. If you are the visual type, who needs usability and simplicity to follow the concepts, turn around.

The net.art list

Vuk Cosic. One of the artists of the Ljubljana digital media lab. I really enjoy his stuff. Some of them are very ‘avant-garde’ but certainly worth your time.

Super Bad. If you like cats, kittys, Lolcats or whatever this might be a sight for you! I warn you though, it’s not THAT conventional.

etoy. This is probably my favourite. Just read what their new project is all about

an ultra long term project that allows pioneers of the information age to travel space and time forever…

One of their coolest projects was the digital hijack in 1996.

Brandon. That’s cool. You have to solve small puzzles to carry on. I really like it.

0100101110101101. Cyberpsace in its purest form. These two artists mostly devise hoaxes. They even spread a virus as a work of art. Thanks!

War.

borderXing guide
. It took me some time to decode this site’s structure, form and principle, but it finally got me thinking.

Netzliteratur. I’m sorry to say, that this site is in german. It is full of net art projects and essays. start learning german?

This is certainly not a large list. But these sites contain so much information, that can keep you surfing, reading and browsing for hours. Handle with care.

web 2.0 robojiannis 26 Feb 2008 6 Comments

The tipping point toast

I have expressed before my belief on Gladwell’s tipping point. I just found a very interesting post on the tipping point, where Duncan Watts (network thoerist, wrote ‘Six Degrees’) poses his disregard on Gladwell’s thesis. Take a look at it, it is very thorough and well argumented.

In other news, I will probably not submit any new post for the next days, since I’m finishing my master thesis. I’m planning though, a post on the semantic web. I think I’ll have it ready on Monday. So see you then.

Network theory robojiannis 31 Jan 2008 No Comments

IJIRE’s launch a week before Pownce

While some academic circles do not agree with the tactic of internet research, the Internation Journal of Internet Research Ethics has elevated it into a study. It was a logical step to be made since,

with the emergence of Internet use as a research locale and tool throughout the 1990s, researchers from disparate disciplines, ranging from the social sciences to humanities to the sciences, have found a new fertile ground for research opportunities that differ greatly from their traditional biomedical counterparts. As such, “populations,” locales, and spaces that had no corresponding physical environment became a focal point, or site of research activity.

IJIRE_logo

But don’t be intimidated; it’s not a philosophical approach of the matters. The IJIRE doesn’t publish only theoretical, but also practical articles, where case studies of online research are embraced.
The Journal covers a broad variety of questions, which rise out of the practice of internet research:

How is informed consent obtained? Is this really human subjects work? How do diverse methodological approaches result in distinctive ethical conflicts – and, possibly, distinctive ethical resolutions? What about privacy? How do researchers collaborating across diverse ethical and legal domains recognize and resolve ethical issues in ways that recognize and incorporate often markedly different ethical understandings? What about research on minors?

The constant transformation of the web along with the emergence of social networks provide constructive ground for analysis in the fields of privacy, ownership, legal issues, authorial ethics and anonymity.

Some of the subjects discussed in this semesters’ issue are:

  • Ethical Approaches to Robotic Data Gathering in Academic Research
  • Data as Representation: Beyond Anonymity in e-Research Ethics
  • Creating a Web of Attribution in the Feminist Blogosphere

The journal is free to download and open to submissions.

Forgive me for using the Pownce buzz to get attention to this post, but I think IJIRE is really worth it.

Micha, thanks for the link!

Authorship robojiannis 22 Jan 2008 No Comments

15+ tools and visualizations for your social network

Think of the social web as a huge town.
Like each town it has central squares, where many road lead. It also has central authorities, which have enough connections to direct you almost everywhere. Finally, like any city it has your friends, acquaintances but also people you hardly know. Depending on who you know (the mayor, a police officer or a salesman), you can get some jobs done much faster, while others require days and days of hard work.
But if you have the right connections and know which roads to follow, the town lies in front of you, like an open book.
The best way to learn your way around this city (and any city) is to have a map of it.
This is a list of static and interactive tools, which will reveal how the town called social web work. The static tools are mostly visuals of well-known social networks. The interactive tools are free software, which will let you study your own social networks.
Purpose of this list is to provide the instruments to help you decode the social web. Maybe if you try a hard enough and read between the lines, you’ll understand how the social web is connected.
Now you have the tools to find who are the hubs in your networks.

Static Toolsvisual_map

Les Miserables: The network of interactions between major characters in the novel Les Miserables by Victor Hugo, divided in 11 communities represented by different colors.

Flickrland: Network analysis of the Flickr population, based on data collected on March 14th, 2005.
Vizster: Vizster is an interactive visualization tool for online social networks, allowing exploration of the community structure of social networking services such as friendster.com, tribe.net, and orkut.
Enron’s email pattern: This graph produced by The New York Times reveals a map of a week’s e-mail patterns in May 2001, when a new name suddenly appeared.
Mapping the new testament: One of hundreds of interesting visualizations in Many Eyes is the Map of social relationships in the New Testament.
Data Visualization of a social network: Different aspects of a real life social network.
The spread of obesity in a large social network: The prevalence of obesity has increased from 23% to 31% over the recent past in the United States, and 66% of adults are overweight. In order to better understand this phenomenon, the authors in this study performed a quantitative analysis of the nature and extent of the person-to-person spread of obesity as a possible factor contributing to the obesity epidemic.

Steroids network in major league baseball: Sen. George Mitchell’s 409-page report on performance-enhancing drugs in baseball describes a thriving underground market for steroids and human growth hormone. This is a visualization of Mitchell’s report.

Interactive Toolsfidgt

Fidgt: A Social Networking Address Book, which keeps track of all your friends and their media across different social networks (flickr, last.fm, msn messanger and other network supported).
Social Circles: Social Circles intends to partially reveal the social networks that emerge in mailing lists.
LJNet: LJNet is an interactive visualization of LiveJournal.com (LJ) members’ social networks. It shows the friends and friends of friends of any given LJ member.
TouchGraph: Another LiveJournal visualization tool. Now for Facebook too.
Email Constellations: This project aims to be a free, flexible, and easily modifiable visualisation tool that allows a user to intuitively understand their online social group structure.
Tracking the threat: TrackingTheThreat.com is database of open source information about the Al Qaeda terrorist network, developed as a research project of the FMS Advanced Systems Group.
Map of MySpace Friends: This is a simple force-directed graph that maps the relationships between myspace users.
Comment Flow: Building upon a traditional force-directed network layout consisting of nodes (profiles) and edges (friend-links), the system shows the activity and the information exchange (postings in the comment box) between nodes, taking the sequence and age of the messages into account.
Mapping the digg community: Using the Digg API, Brian Shaler created a map of Digg users and how they’re connected to each other.
Facebook friend wheel: colorful wheel that maps all the links between Facebook friends.
Nexus: Nexus is a friend grapher for Facebook built on Graphviz twopi and neato. It calculates friend similarity by parsing profiles (through the Facebook API), and highlights links between friends who share interests and groups.

Network theory robojiannis 20 Jan 2008 8 Comments

Next Page »