This theme is downloaded from wordpress themes website.

Archive for March, 2008

Google Street View Panopticon

I know that Google’s Street View is old news.

Google actually uses an extremely high-tech camera, scrounges the streets and takes photos. I’ve never really used the service myself, but while surfing today I found some articles that drew my attention on the subject.

Invading Privacy

Mashable: Mashable’s top 15 google street view sightings is supposed to be an entertaining article listing some pictures of several interesting and funny places around the world. What is disturbing in this article is not only the complete disregard of people’s privacy but also the quality and quantity of comments.

There are currently 155 comments linking to other sighting (guy picking his nose or girl showing her panties, etc.) or praising the humor of the article. From these 155 comments only 8 are actually referring to the factor of privacy.
Googlesightseeing: A little bit more search down the road and I found googlesightseeing.com. This site’s niche is posting images from Google Maps and Google’s Street View. Of course this might not directly say anything about privacy issues, since images of people are not that often on the site. But it implies something else:

There are people, who are extensively searching these all-viewing databases. So it is not the government, the CIA or “add conspiracy theory here” but ordinary people that are breaking the privacy barrier.

Psychology of ControlBentham's prison model

The panopticon was a model prison proposal of Jeremy Bentham in 1785. The idea was that the prisoners could not see the guards observing them. Although the concept was never realized, Bentham

pointed out that the prison could employ very few guards, since the prisoners could not know when they were being watched. The project’s key concept, however, wasn’t about architecture or economics; it was about the psychology of control.

In other words, people will start developing a sense of being constantly observed and therefore behave accordingly. It seems that there is not only a central authority, which practices control and surveillance, but also the society in general. Google’s Street View is one of the tools provided to the public to spy on each other.

Between private and public

But where are the boundaries between private and public?
There has been a great discussion on the subject;

It is already questionable how can we achieve true privacy, but the question goes beyond the boundaries of public and private. We are witnessing the development of an all-seeing, all-knowing society.
I’m already against any surveillance of any kind but moreover should the public really have access to such spying tools?

privacy robojiannis 05 Mar 2008 No Comments

The morality of Data Portability

I just read a very interesting post about data portability on Mashable. Data Portability Logo

In short the author argues, that data portability is boring because:

  • the average internet user probably isn’t active in many web 2.0 sites.
  • the average internet user probably doesn’t want to take his friends along every web 2.0 service he signs up for.
  • what rights do users have to control where shared data goes?

So he says, that there is actually no demand for data portability.

I can see his point and I actually agree completely. Data portability is probably referring to extremely active users.

Moral Data Portability

The way I have understood data portability, it is about data. You can take your facebook friends and put them on kaioo. You then use kaioo as your platform, while not losing contact with your facebook friends.

So I see a moral side of data portability. If I want to move my data/friends from one site to another I want to be able to. It is not only about who owns the data, it is also about not monopolizing your network.
Data portability gives you the option to decide which platform suits you best. This doesn’t necessarily mean being active in 10 different social networks. It just means choosing how you communicate with your friends in the community you are in.

I believe that has a value, which every average user could understand.

Reaching the average user is another subject. Data portability must extend to data usability too. The process of moving your contacts from one network to another must become as easy as signing up.
That’s where data portability might lose the game.

social networks robojiannis 02 Mar 2008 2 Comments

« Previous Page