Comments on: Google Knol vs. Wikipedia http://changemod.com/755/2007/12/17/google-knol-vs-wikipedia/ The theory of social networks and the evolution of the web. Studying the social web, network theory, blogging and privacy issues of the internet. Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:19:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: M@ri@nn@ http://changemod.com/755/2007/12/17/google-knol-vs-wikipedia/#comment-24 M@ri@nn@ Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:13:38 +0000 http://changemod.com/755/2007/12/17/google-knol-vs-wikipedia/#comment-24 ??? ???? ??? ????????? ??? ?????? ???, social media ??? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ??? ????????? ??? ?????? ???, social media ??? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ?????

]]> By: M@ri@nn@ http://changemod.com/755/2007/12/17/google-knol-vs-wikipedia/#comment-23 M@ri@nn@ Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:08:47 +0000 http://changemod.com/755/2007/12/17/google-knol-vs-wikipedia/#comment-23 I will also agree with the opinion that Knol is not at all a threat to Wiki. Knol will serve a target group that at the moment Wikipedia doesn't totally "satisfy". I believe, competition indeed enhances knowledge and highlighting the authors creates a trustworthy exchange of information. Moreover you can always leave a comment! Having the chance to comment will enable the interaction and communication between authors and authors or non-authors. Meaning that you can always leave a comment if you are not ready or able to publish your own article signed. For my part it will be a kind of a good conversation with arguments, change of opinions that most of the times brings true and objective results as well as clear answers! I like it cause, it's all about knowledge, isnt it? I will also agree with the opinion that Knol is not at all a threat to Wiki.
Knol will serve a target group that at the moment Wikipedia doesn’t totally “satisfy”. I believe, competition indeed enhances knowledge and highlighting the authors creates a trustworthy exchange of information. Moreover you can always leave a comment!
Having the chance to comment will enable the interaction and communication between authors and authors or non-authors. Meaning that you can always leave a comment if you are not ready or able to publish your own article signed. For my part it will be a kind of a good conversation with arguments, change of opinions that most of the times brings true and objective results as well as clear answers!
I like it cause, it’s all about knowledge, isnt it?

]]> By: robojiannis http://changemod.com/755/2007/12/17/google-knol-vs-wikipedia/#comment-19 robojiannis Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:22:30 +0000 http://changemod.com/755/2007/12/17/google-knol-vs-wikipedia/#comment-19 I just saw a post on slashdot, that in a way speaks for knol. Which mathematical proofs should wikipedia publish?Should it just state the bare results of theorems and not provide proofs (except as external links)? http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=426906 I just saw a post on slashdot, that in a way speaks for knol. Which mathematical proofs should wikipedia publish?Should it just state the bare results of theorems and not provide proofs (except as external links)?

http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=426906

]]>